An equilateral glass prism (n=1.52 for red light, n=1.55 for violet light) is placed in air (n=1.00).
(a) Calculate the critical angle for the glass-air interface for red light.
(b) Light enters one face of the prism at an angle of incidence of 40∘. Calculate the angle of emergence for red light and state whether total internal reflection occurs at the second face.
(c) Calculate the angular dispersion (the angle between the emergent red and violet rays) for the same angle of incidence.
Solution:
(a) Critical angle: sinθc=1/n=1/1.52=0.6579
θc=41.1∘
(b) At the first face (angle of incidence i1=40∘):
Number of reflections per metre: N=1/(2.12×10−4)=4720reflectionsm−1
UT-3: Refractive Index from Real and Apparent Depth
Question:
A student measures the apparent depth of a coin at the bottom of a pool of liquid. The real depth is (40.0±0.5)cm and the apparent depth is (28.5±0.5)cm.
(a) Calculate the refractive index of the liquid and its uncertainty.
(b) The student then observes a mark on the bottom of a glass block of refractive index 1.52 through the liquid. The glass block is 3.0cm thick. Calculate the apparent thickness of the glass block as viewed through the liquid.
(c) Explain why the apparent depth formula only applies for near-normal viewing angles.
(b) For near-normal incidence, the apparent depth of an object in a medium of refractive index n1 viewed from a medium of refractive index n2 is dapparent=d×n2/n1.
The light path is: glass (ng=1.52, thickness dg=3.0cm) → liquid (nl=1.40) → air (na=1.00).
For the glass block viewed from air through the intervening liquid, the apparent thickness is:
dapp=ngdg=1.523.0=1.97cm
The apparent depth formula uses the refractive index of the object's medium relative to the observer's medium. The liquid layer does not change the apparent thickness of the glass block itself; it only affects the apparent depth of objects within or below the liquid. The total apparent depth of the bottom of the glass from the liquid surface would be dl/nl+dg/ng, but the apparent thickness of the glass alone is dg/ng=1.97cm.
(c) The apparent depth formula dapp=d/n is derived using the small-angle (paraxial) approximation. At larger angles, Snell's law gives a curved relationship between real and apparent position, and the simple ratio no longer holds. The apparent depth depends on the viewing angle, and the image position varies with angle -- a phenomenon known as aberration. Additionally, at large angles, the formula breaks down because it assumes all rays from a point converge to a single image point, which is only true for paraxial rays.
IT-1: Refraction at a Curved Interface (with Wave Properties)
Question:
A glass sphere of radius R=10cm and refractive index n=1.50 is in air. A narrow beam of light enters the sphere parallel to a diameter, at a distance h=6.0cm from the diameter.
(a) Calculate the angle of refraction at the first surface.
(b) Calculate the angle of incidence at the second (inner) surface and determine whether the ray undergoes total internal reflection.
(c) If not, calculate the angle of emergence and the total deviation of the ray.
Solution:
(a) The angle of incidence at the first surface:
sini1=h/R=6.0/10=0.60⇒i1=36.9∘
By Snell's law: sini1=nsinr1
sinr1=0.60/1.50=0.40⇒r1=23.6∘
(b) The ray travels inside the sphere and hits the far surface. The geometry gives:
The angle of incidence at the second surface i2=r1=23.6∘ (by the isosceles triangle formed by the two radii).
Critical angle: θc=sin−1(1/1.50)=41.1∘
Since i2=23.6∘<θc, TIR does not occur.
(c) At the second surface: nsini2=sine2
sine2=1.50×sin23.6∘=1.50×0.400=0.600e2=36.9∘
The ray emerges parallel to the original direction (as expected for a sphere). The total deviation is:
For TIR to occur: r1≥θc=41.1∘, which requires i1 such that sini1≥1.50×sin41.1∘=1.50×0.657=0.986, i.e. i1≥80.4∘ or h≥9.86cm. Only rays very close to the edge undergo TIR.
IT-2: Optical Fibre Signal Attenuation (with DC Circuits)
Question:
An optical fibre of length 5.0km has an attenuation of 0.30dBkm−1. A laser source couples 5.0mW of optical power into the fibre.
(a) Calculate the power at the output end of the fibre.
(b) The fibre has a numerical aperture of 0.22 and core diameter 62.5μm. Calculate the maximum acceptance angle and the solid angle of acceptance.
(c) If the fibre is bent to a radius of curvature of 5.0cm, estimate whether significant power loss occurs due to bending.
Without the wavelength, we can estimate: for typical telecom fibres, bend losses become significant below R≈10--30mm for single-mode fibres. For multimode fibres with larger cores, the critical radius is smaller.
At R=5.0cm=50mm, a multimode fibre of 62.5μm core diameter would experience minimal bending loss. However, tight bends at 5mm radius would cause significant loss.
The key point is that bending changes the angle of incidence at the core-cladding boundary. Some rays that previously satisfied the TIR condition no longer do, and they leak into the cladding. This is macrobending loss.
IT-3: Prism as a Reflecting Element (with Superposition)
Question:
A right-angled isosceles glass prism (n=1.55) is used as a reflector, with light entering one of the short faces and hitting the hypotenuse.
(a) Calculate the critical angle for the glass-air interface.
(b) Show that total internal reflection occurs at the hypotenuse when light enters the short face at normal incidence.
(c) Calculate the maximum angle of incidence on the short face for which TIR still occurs at the hypotenuse.
Solution:
(a) sinθc=1/n=1/1.55=0.6452
θc=40.2∘
(b) At normal incidence on the short face, the light enters undeviated (r1=0). It hits the hypotenuse at 45∘ angle of incidence.
Since 45∘>40.2∘=θc, TIR occurs. The ray is reflected through 90∘.
(c) Let the angle of incidence on the short face be i.
By Snell's law: sini=nsinr, where r is the angle of refraction.
The ray hits the hypotenuse at angle i2=45∘−r.
For TIR: i2≥θc=40.2∘
45∘−r≥40.2∘r≤4.8∘
sini=nsinr≤1.55×sin4.8∘=1.55×0.0837=0.1297i≤7.5∘
The maximum angle of incidence for TIR at the hypotenuse is 7.5∘. Beyond this, some light is transmitted through the hypotenuse and the prism no longer acts as a perfect reflector. This limits the acceptance angle of prismatic reflectors.