Board Coverage
Board Paper Notes AQA Paper 1 Proof by deduction, contradiction, exhaustion, counterexample Edexcel P1, P2 Similar; induction in P2 OCR (A) Paper 1, 2 Proof is integrated throughout CIE (9709) P1, P2, P3 Various methods across papers
Proof questions appear on every paper. You must be able to identify the appropriate proof
method and execute it clearly, with every step justified.
1. Proof by Deduction
1.1 Method
Proof by deduction starts from known axioms, definitions, or previously proved results, and uses
logical steps to arrive at the desired conclusion.
1.2 Example: the sum of an arithmetic series
Theorem. S n = n 2 ( a + l ) = n 2 [ 2 a + ( n − 1 ) d ] S_n = \dfrac{n}{2}(a + l) = \dfrac{n}{2}[2a + (n-1)d] S n = 2 n ( a + l ) = 2 n [ 2 a + ( n − 1 ) d ] .
Proof. Write out the sum forwards and backwards:
S n = a + ( a + d ) + ( a + 2 d ) + ⋯ + ( a + ( n − 1 ) d ) S n = ( a + ( n − 1 ) d ) + ( a + ( n − 2 ) d ) + ⋯ + a \begin{aligned}
S_n &= a + (a+d) + (a+2d) + \cdots + (a+(n-1)d) \\
S_n &= (a+(n-1)d) + (a+(n-2)d) + \cdots + a
\end{aligned} S n S n = a + ( a + d ) + ( a + 2 d ) + ⋯ + ( a + ( n − 1 ) d ) = ( a + ( n − 1 ) d ) + ( a + ( n − 2 ) d ) + ⋯ + a
Adding the two rows term by term, each pair sums to 2 a + ( n − 1 ) d 2a + (n-1)d 2 a + ( n − 1 ) d , and there are n n n such pairs:
2 S n = n [ 2 a + ( n − 1 ) d ] ⟹ S n = n 2 [ 2 a + ( n − 1 ) d ] ■ 2S_n = n[2a + (n-1)d] \implies S_n = \frac{n}{2}[2a + (n-1)d] \quad \blacksquare 2 S n = n [ 2 a + ( n − 1 ) d ] ⟹ S n = 2 n [ 2 a + ( n − 1 ) d ] ■
1.3 Example: the difference of squares
Theorem. a 2 − b 2 = ( a − b ) ( a + b ) a^2 - b^2 = (a-b)(a+b) a 2 − b 2 = ( a − b ) ( a + b ) for all a , b ∈ R a, b \in \mathbb{R} a , b ∈ R .
Proof. Expanding the right-hand side:
( a − b ) ( a + b ) = a 2 + a b − a b − b 2 = a 2 − b 2 ■ (a-b)(a+b) = a^2 + ab - ab - b^2 = a^2 - b^2 \quad \blacksquare ( a − b ) ( a + b ) = a 2 + ab − ab − b 2 = a 2 − b 2 ■
2. Proof by Contradiction
2.1 Method
To prove a statement P P P by contradiction:
Assume ¬ P \neg P ¬ P (the negation of P P P ).
Derive a logical contradiction.
Conclude that P P P must be true.
2.2 Infinitely many primes
Theorem (Euclid). There are infinitely many prime numbers.
Proof. Suppose, for contradiction, that there are only finitely many primes:
p 1 , p 2 , … , p n p_1, p_2, \ldots, p_n p 1 , p 2 , … , p n .
Consider N = p 1 p 2 ⋯ p n + 1 N = p_1 p_2 \cdots p_n + 1 N = p 1 p 2 ⋯ p n + 1 .
N N N is not divisible by any p i p_i p i : if p i ∣ N p_i \mid N p i ∣ N , then p i ∣ ( N − p 1 ⋯ p n ) = 1 p_i \mid (N - p_1 \cdots p_n) = 1 p i ∣ ( N − p 1 ⋯ p n ) = 1 ,
which is impossible since p i ≥ 2 p_i \geq 2 p i ≥ 2 .
So N N N is either prime itself or divisible by a prime not in our list. Either way, there exists a
prime not among p 1 , … , p n p_1, \ldots, p_n p 1 , … , p n . This contradicts our assumption that the list was complete.
■ \blacksquare ■
2.3 2 \sqrt{2} 2 is irrational
Theorem. 2 \sqrt{2} 2 is irrational.
Proof. Suppose 2 = a b \sqrt{2} = \dfrac{a}{b} 2 = b a where a , b ∈ Z a, b \in \mathbb{Z} a , b ∈ Z , b ≠ 0 b \neq 0 b = 0 , and
gcd ( a , b ) = 1 \gcd(a,b) = 1 g cd( a , b ) = 1 (the fraction is in lowest terms).
2 = a 2 b 2 ⟹ a 2 = 2 b 2 2 = \frac{a^2}{b^2} \implies a^2 = 2b^2 2 = b 2 a 2 ⟹ a 2 = 2 b 2
So a 2 a^2 a 2 is even, which means a a a is even (since the square of an odd number is odd). Write
a = 2 k a = 2k a = 2 k .
( 2 k ) 2 = 2 b 2 ⟹ 4 k 2 = 2 b 2 ⟹ b 2 = 2 k 2 (2k)^2 = 2b^2 \implies 4k^2 = 2b^2 \implies b^2 = 2k^2 ( 2 k ) 2 = 2 b 2 ⟹ 4 k 2 = 2 b 2 ⟹ b 2 = 2 k 2
So b 2 b^2 b 2 is even, meaning b b b is even. But then gcd ( a , b ) ≥ 2 \gcd(a,b) \geq 2 g cd( a , b ) ≥ 2 , contradicting gcd ( a , b ) = 1 \gcd(a,b) = 1 g cd( a , b ) = 1 .
■ \blacksquare ■
2.4 log 2 3 \log_2 3 log 2 3 is irrational
Theorem. log 2 3 \log_2 3 log 2 3 is irrational.
Proof. Suppose log 2 3 = a b \log_2 3 = \dfrac{a}{b} log 2 3 = b a where a , b ∈ Z + a, b \in \mathbb{Z}^+ a , b ∈ Z + and gcd ( a , b ) = 1 \gcd(a,b) = 1 g cd( a , b ) = 1 .
2 a / b = 3 ⟹ 2 a = 3 b 2^{a/b} = 3 \implies 2^a = 3^b 2 a / b = 3 ⟹ 2 a = 3 b
Since 2 a 2^a 2 a is even and 3 b 3^b 3 b is odd, this is a contradiction. ■ \blacksquare ■
3. Proof by Exhaustion
3.1 Method
When the number of cases is finite and small enough, prove each case individually.
3.2 Example: primes less than 10
Claim. All primes less than 10 are odd.
Proof. The primes less than 10 are: 2, 3, 5, 7.
2 is even (the only even prime).
3, 5, 7 are odd.
So not all primes less than 10 are odd. The claim is false . The counterexample is 2.
3.3 Example: sum of two squares
Claim. For all integers n n n with 1 ≤ n ≤ 5 1 \leq n \leq 5 1 ≤ n ≤ 5 , n 2 + ( n + 1 ) 2 n^2 + (n+1)^2 n 2 + ( n + 1 ) 2 is odd.
Proof. Check each case:
n n n n 2 + ( n + 1 ) 2 n^2 + (n+1)^2 n 2 + ( n + 1 ) 2 Odd? 1 1 + 4 = 5 Yes 2 4 + 9 = 13 Yes 3 9 + 16 = 25 Yes 4 16 + 25 = 41 Yes 5 25 + 36 = 61 Yes
All five cases confirmed. ■ \blacksquare ■
warning
manageable. You cannot use exhaustion for "all integers" or "all real numbers."
4. Disproof by Counterexample
4.1 Method
To disprove a universal statement, it suffices to find one example where the statement fails.
4.2 Examples
Claim. "For all real x x x , x 2 > x x^2 \gt{} x x 2 > x ." Counterexample: x = 0.5 x = 0.5 x = 0.5 , since 0.25 ≯ 0.5 0.25 \not> 0.5 0.25 > 0.5 .
Claim. "All quadratics have two distinct real roots." Counterexample: x 2 + 1 = 0 x^2 + 1 = 0 x 2 + 1 = 0 has no real
roots (discriminant = − 4 < 0 = -4 \lt{} 0 = − 4 < 0 ).
Claim. "If n n n is prime, then 2 n − 1 2^n - 1 2 n − 1 is prime." Counterexample: n = 11 n = 11 n = 11 is prime, but
2 11 − 1 = 2047 = 23 × 89 2^{11}-1 = 2047 = 23 \times 89 2 11 − 1 = 2047 = 23 × 89 .
5. Proof by Mathematical Induction
5.1 Method
To prove a statement P ( n ) P(n) P ( n ) for all integers n ≥ n 0 n \geq n_0 n ≥ n 0 :
Base case: Prove P ( n 0 ) P(n_0) P ( n 0 ) is true.
Inductive hypothesis: Assume P ( k ) P(k) P ( k ) is true for some k ≥ n 0 k \geq n_0 k ≥ n 0 .
Inductive step: Using the hypothesis, prove P ( k + 1 ) P(k+1) P ( k + 1 ) is true.
Conclusion: By the principle of mathematical induction, P ( n ) P(n) P ( n ) is true for all n ≥ n 0 n \geq n_0 n ≥ n 0 .
info
non-empty set of positive integers has a least element. If P ( n 0 ) P(n_0) P ( n 0 ) is true but some P ( m ) P(m) P ( m ) with
m > n 0 m \gt{} n_0 m > n 0 is false, then the set { m : P ( m ) i s f a l s e } \{m : P(m) \mathrm{ is false}\} { m : P ( m ) isfalse } has a least element,
contradicting the inductive step.
5.2 Sum of the first n n n integers
Theorem. ∑ r = 1 n r = n ( n + 1 ) 2 \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} r = \frac{n(n+1)}{2} r = 1 ∑ n r = 2 n ( n + 1 ) for all n ∈ N n \in \mathbb{N} n ∈ N .
Proof.
Base case (n = 1 n=1 n = 1 ): ∑ r = 1 1 r = 1 = ◆ L B ◆ 1 × 2 ◆ R B ◆◆ L B ◆ 2 ◆ R B ◆ \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{1} r = 1 = \frac◆LB◆1 \times 2◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆ r = 1 ∑ 1 r = 1 = L ◆ B ◆1 × 2◆ R B ◆◆ L B ◆2◆ R B ◆ . ✓
Inductive hypothesis: Assume ∑ r = 1 k r = k ( k + 1 ) 2 \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{k} r = \frac{k(k+1)}{2} r = 1 ∑ k r = 2 k ( k + 1 ) for some
k ≥ 1 k \geq 1 k ≥ 1 .
Inductive step:
∑ r = 1 k + 1 r = ∑ r = 1 k r + ( k + 1 ) = k ( k + 1 ) 2 + ( k + 1 ) ( b y h y p o t h e s i s ) = k ( k + 1 ) + 2 ( k + 1 ) 2 = ( k + 1 ) ( k + 2 ) 2 \begin{aligned}
\sum_{r=1}^{k+1} r &= \sum_{r=1}^{k} r + (k+1) \\
&= \frac{k(k+1)}{2} + (k+1) \quad \mathrm{(by hypothesis)} \\
&= \frac{k(k+1) + 2(k+1)}{2} \\
&= \frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}
\end{aligned} r = 1 ∑ k + 1 r = r = 1 ∑ k r + ( k + 1 ) = 2 k ( k + 1 ) + ( k + 1 ) ( byhypothesis ) = 2 k ( k + 1 ) + 2 ( k + 1 ) = 2 ( k + 1 ) ( k + 2 )
This is the required formula with n = k + 1 n = k+1 n = k + 1 . ✓
Conclusion: By induction, the formula holds for all n ∈ N n \in \mathbb{N} n ∈ N . ■ \blacksquare ■
5.3 Sum of squares
Theorem. ∑ r = 1 n r 2 = n ( n + 1 ) ( 2 n + 1 ) 6 \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} r^2 = \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6} r = 1 ∑ n r 2 = 6 n ( n + 1 ) ( 2 n + 1 ) .
Proof.
Base case (n = 1 n=1 n = 1 ): 1 = ◆ L B ◆ 1 × 2 × 3 ◆ R B ◆◆ L B ◆ 6 ◆ R B ◆ = 1 1 = \dfrac◆LB◆1 \times 2 \times 3◆RB◆◆LB◆6◆RB◆ = 1 1 = L ◆ B ◆1 × 2 × 3◆ R B ◆◆ L B ◆6◆ R B ◆ = 1 . ✓
Inductive hypothesis: Assume ∑ r = 1 k r 2 = k ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 1 ) 6 \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{k} r^2 = \frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6} r = 1 ∑ k r 2 = 6 k ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 1 ) .
Inductive step:
∑ r = 1 k + 1 r 2 = k ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 1 ) 6 + ( k + 1 ) 2 = k ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 1 ) + 6 ( k + 1 ) 2 6 = ( k + 1 ) [ k ( 2 k + 1 ) + 6 ( k + 1 ) ] 6 = ( k + 1 ) [ 2 k 2 + k + 6 k + 6 ] 6 = ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k 2 + 7 k + 6 ) 6 = ( k + 1 ) ( k + 2 ) ( 2 k + 3 ) 6 \begin{aligned}
\sum_{r=1}^{k+1} r^2 &= \frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6} + (k+1)^2 \\
&= \frac{k(k+1)(2k+1) + 6(k+1)^2}{6} \\
&= \frac{(k+1)[k(2k+1) + 6(k+1)]}{6} \\
&= \frac{(k+1)[2k^2+k+6k+6]}{6} \\
&= \frac{(k+1)(2k^2+7k+6)}{6} \\
&= \frac{(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)}{6}
\end{aligned} r = 1 ∑ k + 1 r 2 = 6 k ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 1 ) + ( k + 1 ) 2 = 6 k ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k + 1 ) + 6 ( k + 1 ) 2 = 6 ( k + 1 ) [ k ( 2 k + 1 ) + 6 ( k + 1 )] = 6 ( k + 1 ) [ 2 k 2 + k + 6 k + 6 ] = 6 ( k + 1 ) ( 2 k 2 + 7 k + 6 ) = 6 ( k + 1 ) ( k + 2 ) ( 2 k + 3 )
This is the formula with n = k + 1 n = k+1 n = k + 1 . ✓ ■ \blacksquare ■
5.4 Divisibility
Theorem. 3 n − 1 3^n - 1 3 n − 1 is divisible by 2 for all n ∈ N n \in \mathbb{N} n ∈ N .
Proof.
Base case (n = 1 n=1 n = 1 ): 3 1 − 1 = 2 3^1 - 1 = 2 3 1 − 1 = 2 , which is divisible by 2. ✓
Hypothesis: Assume 3 k − 1 = 2 m 3^k - 1 = 2m 3 k − 1 = 2 m for some integer m m m .
Step: 3 k + 1 − 1 = 3 ⋅ 3 k − 1 = 3 ( 2 m + 1 ) − 1 = 6 m + 3 − 1 = 6 m + 2 = 2 ( 3 m + 1 ) 3^{k+1} - 1 = 3 \cdot 3^k - 1 = 3(2m+1) - 1 = 6m + 3 - 1 = 6m + 2 = 2(3m+1) 3 k + 1 − 1 = 3 ⋅ 3 k − 1 = 3 ( 2 m + 1 ) − 1 = 6 m + 3 − 1 = 6 m + 2 = 2 ( 3 m + 1 ) .
This is divisible by 2. ✓ ■ \blacksquare ■
Theorem. 4 n − 1 4^n - 1 4 n − 1 is divisible by 3 for all n ∈ N n \in \mathbb{N} n ∈ N .
Proof.
Base case (n = 1 n=1 n = 1 ): 4 − 1 = 3 4-1 = 3 4 − 1 = 3 , divisible by 3. ✓
Hypothesis: 4 k − 1 = 3 m 4^k - 1 = 3m 4 k − 1 = 3 m .
Step: 4 k + 1 − 1 = 4 ⋅ 4 k − 1 = 4 ( 3 m + 1 ) − 1 = 12 m + 4 − 1 = 12 m + 3 = 3 ( 4 m + 1 ) 4^{k+1} - 1 = 4 \cdot 4^k - 1 = 4(3m+1)-1 = 12m+4-1 = 12m+3 = 3(4m+1) 4 k + 1 − 1 = 4 ⋅ 4 k − 1 = 4 ( 3 m + 1 ) − 1 = 12 m + 4 − 1 = 12 m + 3 = 3 ( 4 m + 1 ) . ✓ ■ \blacksquare ■
5.5 Inequalities
Theorem. 2 n > n 2^n \gt{} n 2 n > n for all n ∈ N n \in \mathbb{N} n ∈ N .
Proof.
Base case (n = 1 n=1 n = 1 ): 2 > 1 2 \gt{} 1 2 > 1 . ✓
Hypothesis: 2 k > k 2^k \gt{} k 2 k > k .
Step: 2 k + 1 = 2 ⋅ 2 k > 2 k ≥ k + 1 2^{k+1} = 2 \cdot 2^k \gt{} 2k \geq k + 1 2 k + 1 = 2 ⋅ 2 k > 2 k ≥ k + 1 (since k ≥ 1 k \geq 1 k ≥ 1 implies k ≥ 1 k \geq 1 k ≥ 1 ).
So 2 k + 1 > k + 1 2^{k+1} \gt{} k + 1 2 k + 1 > k + 1 . ✓ ■ \blacksquare ■
Theorem. n ! > 2 n n! \gt{} 2^n n ! > 2 n for all n ≥ 4 n \geq 4 n ≥ 4 .
Proof.
Base case (n = 4 n=4 n = 4 ): 24 > 16 24 \gt{} 16 24 > 16 . ✓
Hypothesis: k ! > 2 k k! \gt{} 2^k k ! > 2 k for k ≥ 4 k \geq 4 k ≥ 4 .
Step:
( k + 1 ) ! = ( k + 1 ) ⋅ k ! > ( k + 1 ) ⋅ 2 k ≥ 5 ⋅ 2 k > 2 ⋅ 2 k = 2 k + 1 (k+1)! = (k+1) \cdot k! \gt{} (k+1) \cdot 2^k \geq 5 \cdot 2^k \gt{} 2 \cdot 2^k = 2^{k+1} ( k + 1 )! = ( k + 1 ) ⋅ k ! > ( k + 1 ) ⋅ 2 k ≥ 5 ⋅ 2 k > 2 ⋅ 2 k = 2 k + 1 .
Since k ≥ 4 k \geq 4 k ≥ 4 , we have k + 1 ≥ 5 > 2 k+1 \geq 5 \gt{} 2 k + 1 ≥ 5 > 2 . ✓ ■ \blacksquare ■
6. Proof Structures and Logic
6.1 Necessary and sufficient conditions
"P P P is necessary for Q Q Q " means Q ⟹ P Q \implies P Q ⟹ P .
"P P P is sufficient for Q Q Q " means P ⟹ Q P \implies Q P ⟹ Q .
"P P P if and only if Q Q Q " (written P ⟺ Q P \iff Q P ⟺ Q ) means both P ⟹ Q P \implies Q P ⟹ Q and Q ⟹ P Q \implies P Q ⟹ P .
6.2 Converse and contrapositive
The converse of P ⟹ Q P \implies Q P ⟹ Q is Q ⟹ P Q \implies P Q ⟹ P (not logically equivalent).
The contrapositive of P ⟹ Q P \implies Q P ⟹ Q is ¬ Q ⟹ ¬ P \neg Q \implies \neg P ¬ Q ⟹ ¬ P (logically equivalent).
Problem Set
Details
Problem 1
Prove that the product of two odd numbers is odd.
Details
Solution 1
Let the two odd numbers be
2 m + 1 2m+1 2 m + 1 and
2 n + 1 2n+1 2 n + 1 where
m , n ∈ Z m, n \in \mathbb{Z} m , n ∈ Z .
( 2 m + 1 ) ( 2 n + 1 ) = 4 m n + 2 m + 2 n + 1 = 2 ( 2 m n + m + n ) + 1 (2m+1)(2n+1) = 4mn + 2m + 2n + 1 = 2(2mn+m+n) + 1 ( 2 m + 1 ) ( 2 n + 1 ) = 4 mn + 2 m + 2 n + 1 = 2 ( 2 mn + m + n ) + 1 .
This is of the form 2 k + 1 2k+1 2 k + 1 (with k = 2 m n + m + n k = 2mn+m+n k = 2 mn + m + n ), hence odd. ■ \blacksquare ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Proof by Deduction — Section 1.
Details
Problem 2
Prove by contradiction that there is no greatest even integer.
Details
Solution 2
Suppose
N N N is the greatest even integer. Then
N = 2 k N = 2k N = 2 k for some
k ∈ Z k \in \mathbb{Z} k ∈ Z .
But N + 2 = 2 k + 2 = 2 ( k + 1 ) N + 2 = 2k + 2 = 2(k+1) N + 2 = 2 k + 2 = 2 ( k + 1 ) is also even, and N + 2 > N N+2 \gt{} N N + 2 > N . This contradicts N N N being the
greatest even integer. ■ \blacksquare ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Proof by Contradiction — Section 2.
Details
Problem 3
Prove by induction that
∑ r = 1 n r 3 = [ n ( n + 1 ) 2 ] 2 \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} r^3 = \left[\frac{n(n+1)}{2}\right]^2 r = 1 ∑ n r 3 = [ 2 n ( n + 1 ) ] 2 for all
n ∈ N n \in \mathbb{N} n ∈ N .
Details
Solution 3
Base case (n = 1 n=1 n = 1 ): 1 3 = 1 = [ ◆ L B ◆ 1 ⋅ 2 ◆ R B ◆◆ L B ◆ 2 ◆ R B ◆ ] 2 = 1 1^3 = 1 = \left[\dfrac◆LB◆1 \cdot 2◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆\right]^2 = 1 1 3 = 1 = [ L ◆ B ◆1 ⋅ 2◆ R B ◆◆ L B ◆2◆ R B ◆ ] 2 = 1 . ✓
Hypothesis: ∑ r = 1 k r 3 = [ k ( k + 1 ) 2 ] 2 \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{k} r^3 = \left[\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right]^2 r = 1 ∑ k r 3 = [ 2 k ( k + 1 ) ] 2 .
Step:
∑ r = 1 k + 1 r 3 = [ k ( k + 1 ) 2 ] 2 + ( k + 1 ) 3 = k 2 ( k + 1 ) 2 4 + ( k + 1 ) 3 = ( k + 1 ) 2 [ k 2 + 4 ( k + 1 ) ] 4 = ( k + 1 ) 2 ( k 2 + 4 k + 4 ) 4 = ( k + 1 ) 2 ( k + 2 ) 2 4 = [ ( k + 1 ) ( k + 2 ) 2 ] 2 ■ \begin{aligned}
\sum_{r=1}^{k+1} r^3 &= \left[\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right]^2 + (k+1)^3 \\
&= \frac{k^2(k+1)^2}{4} + (k+1)^3 \\
&= \frac{(k+1)^2[k^2 + 4(k+1)]}{4} \\
&= \frac{(k+1)^2(k^2+4k+4)}{4} \\
&= \frac{(k+1)^2(k+2)^2}{4} \\
&= \left[\frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}\right]^2 \quad \blacksquare
\end{aligned} r = 1 ∑ k + 1 r 3 = [ 2 k ( k + 1 ) ] 2 + ( k + 1 ) 3 = 4 k 2 ( k + 1 ) 2 + ( k + 1 ) 3 = 4 ( k + 1 ) 2 [ k 2 + 4 ( k + 1 )] = 4 ( k + 1 ) 2 ( k 2 + 4 k + 4 ) = 4 ( k + 1 ) 2 ( k + 2 ) 2 = [ 2 ( k + 1 ) ( k + 2 ) ] 2 ■ If you get this wrong, revise:
Proof by Mathematical Induction — Section 5.
Details
Problem 4
Prove that
3 \sqrt{3} 3 is irrational.
Details
Solution 4
Suppose
3 = a / b \sqrt{3} = a/b 3 = a / b in lowest terms with
a , b ∈ Z + a, b \in \mathbb{Z}^+ a , b ∈ Z + ,
gcd ( a , b ) = 1 \gcd(a,b) = 1 g cd( a , b ) = 1 .
3 = a 2 / b 2 ⟹ a 2 = 3 b 2 3 = a^2/b^2 \implies a^2 = 3b^2 3 = a 2 / b 2 ⟹ a 2 = 3 b 2 , so 3 ∣ a 2 3 \mid a^2 3 ∣ a 2 , hence 3 ∣ a 3 \mid a 3 ∣ a . Write a = 3 k a = 3k a = 3 k .
9 k 2 = 3 b 2 ⟹ b 2 = 3 k 2 9k^2 = 3b^2 \implies b^2 = 3k^2 9 k 2 = 3 b 2 ⟹ b 2 = 3 k 2 , so 3 ∣ b 2 3 \mid b^2 3 ∣ b 2 , hence 3 ∣ b 3 \mid b 3 ∣ b .
But gcd ( a , b ) ≥ 3 \gcd(a,b) \geq 3 g cd( a , b ) ≥ 3 , contradicting gcd ( a , b ) = 1 \gcd(a,b) = 1 g cd( a , b ) = 1 . ■ \blacksquare ■
If you get this wrong, revise: 2 \sqrt{2} 2 is irrational — Section
2.3.
Details
Problem 5
Disprove by counterexample: "For all real
x x x ,
sin ( 2 x ) = 2 sin x \sin(2x) = 2\sin x sin ( 2 x ) = 2 sin x ."
Details
Solution 5
Let
x = π / 4 x = \pi/4 x = π /4 .
sin ( π / 2 ) = 1 \sin(\pi/2) = 1 sin ( π /2 ) = 1 but
2 sin ( π / 4 ) = 2 × ◆ L B ◆ 2 ◆ R B ◆◆ L B ◆ 2 ◆ R B ◆ = 2 ≠ 1 2\sin(\pi/4) = 2 \times \dfrac◆LB◆\sqrt{2}◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆ = \sqrt{2} \neq 1 2 sin ( π /4 ) = 2 × L ◆ B ◆ 2 ◆ R B ◆◆ L B ◆2◆ R B ◆ = 2 = 1 .
(The correct identity is sin ( 2 x ) = 2 sin x cos x \sin(2x) = 2\sin x\cos x sin ( 2 x ) = 2 sin x cos x .)
If you get this wrong, revise: Disproof by Counterexample —
Section 4.
Details
Problem 6
Prove by induction that
5 n + 3 5^n + 3 5 n + 3 is divisible by 4 for all
n ≥ 1 n \geq 1 n ≥ 1 .
Details
Solution 6
Base case (n = 1 n=1 n = 1 ): 5 + 3 = 8 5 + 3 = 8 5 + 3 = 8 , divisible by 4. ✓
Hypothesis: 5 k + 3 = 4 m 5^k + 3 = 4m 5 k + 3 = 4 m .
Step: 5 k + 1 + 3 = 5 ⋅ 5 k + 3 = 5 ( 4 m − 3 ) + 3 = 20 m − 15 + 3 = 20 m − 12 = 4 ( 5 m − 3 ) 5^{k+1} + 3 = 5 \cdot 5^k + 3 = 5(4m-3) + 3 = 20m - 15 + 3 = 20m - 12 = 4(5m-3) 5 k + 1 + 3 = 5 ⋅ 5 k + 3 = 5 ( 4 m − 3 ) + 3 = 20 m − 15 + 3 = 20 m − 12 = 4 ( 5 m − 3 ) .
Divisible by 4. ✓ ■ \blacksquare ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Divisibility — Section 5.4.
Details
Problem 7
Prove by contradiction that
log 3 5 \log_3 5 log 3 5 is irrational.
Details
Solution 7
Suppose
log 3 5 = a / b \log_3 5 = a/b log 3 5 = a / b where
a , b ∈ Z + a, b \in \mathbb{Z}^+ a , b ∈ Z + ,
gcd ( a , b ) = 1 \gcd(a,b)=1 g cd( a , b ) = 1 .
3 a / b = 5 ⟹ 3 a = 5 b 3^{a/b} = 5 \implies 3^a = 5^b 3 a / b = 5 ⟹ 3 a = 5 b .
3 a 3^a 3 a is odd and 5 b 5^b 5 b is odd, so no immediate parity contradiction. But: 3 a 3^a 3 a is divisible only by
3, while 5 b 5^b 5 b is divisible only by 5. A positive integer cannot have prime factorisation using only
3s and also only 5s (by the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, prime factorisation is unique).
Contradiction. ■ \blacksquare ■
If you get this wrong, revise: log 2 3 \log_2 3 log 2 3 is irrational — Section
2.4.
Details
Problem 8
Use proof by exhaustion to show that all integers
n n n with
1 ≤ n ≤ 6 1 \leq n \leq 6 1 ≤ n ≤ 6 satisfy: if
n n n is prime, then
n 2 − 1 n^2 - 1 n 2 − 1 is divisible by 24 or
n = 2 n = 2 n = 2 or
n = 3 n = 3 n = 3 .
Details
Solution 8
Primes in range: 2, 3, 5.
n = 2 n=2 n = 2 : n 2 − 1 = 3 n^2-1 = 3 n 2 − 1 = 3 , not divisible by 24 (special case n = 2 n=2 n = 2 ). n = 3 n=3 n = 3 : n 2 − 1 = 8 n^2-1 = 8 n 2 − 1 = 8 , not divisible by
24 (special case n = 3 n=3 n = 3 ). n = 5 n=5 n = 5 : n 2 − 1 = 24 n^2-1 = 24 n 2 − 1 = 24 , divisible by 24. ✓
So the claim holds: primes 2 and 3 are exceptions, and 5 2 − 1 = 24 5^2 - 1 = 24 5 2 − 1 = 24 is divisible by 24.
If you get this wrong, revise: Proof by Exhaustion — Section 3.
Details
Problem 9
Prove by induction that
n 3 − n n^3 - n n 3 − n is divisible by 6 for all
n ≥ 1 n \geq 1 n ≥ 1 .
Details
Solution 9
Base case (n = 1 n=1 n = 1 ): 1 − 1 = 0 1-1=0 1 − 1 = 0 , divisible by 6. ✓
Hypothesis: k 3 − k = 6 m k^3 - k = 6m k 3 − k = 6 m .
Step: ( k + 1 ) 3 − ( k + 1 ) = k 3 + 3 k 2 + 3 k + 1 − k − 1 = ( k 3 − k ) + 3 k 2 + 3 k = 6 m + 3 k ( k + 1 ) (k+1)^3 - (k+1) = k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k + 1 - k - 1 = (k^3 - k) + 3k^2 + 3k = 6m + 3k(k+1) ( k + 1 ) 3 − ( k + 1 ) = k 3 + 3 k 2 + 3 k + 1 − k − 1 = ( k 3 − k ) + 3 k 2 + 3 k = 6 m + 3 k ( k + 1 ) .
Since k ( k + 1 ) k(k+1) k ( k + 1 ) is always even (product of consecutive integers), 3 k ( k + 1 ) 3k(k+1) 3 k ( k + 1 ) is divisible by 6. So
( k + 1 ) 3 − ( k + 1 ) = 6 m + 6 n = 6 ( m + n ) (k+1)^3 - (k+1) = 6m + 6n = 6(m+n) ( k + 1 ) 3 − ( k + 1 ) = 6 m + 6 n = 6 ( m + n ) . ✓ ■ \blacksquare ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Divisibility — Section 5.4.
Details
Problem 10
Prove that if
a 2 + b 2 = c 2 a^2 + b^2 = c^2 a 2 + b 2 = c 2 for integers
a , b , c a, b, c a , b , c , then at least one of
a , b a, b a , b is even.
Details
Solution 10
Proof by contradiction. Suppose both
a a a and
b b b are odd. Write
a = 2 m + 1 a = 2m+1 a = 2 m + 1 ,
b = 2 n + 1 b = 2n+1 b = 2 n + 1 .
a 2 + b 2 = ( 2 m + 1 ) 2 + ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 = 4 m 2 + 4 m + 1 + 4 n 2 + 4 n + 1 = 2 ( 2 m 2 + 2 m + 2 n 2 + 2 n + 1 ) a^2 + b^2 = (2m+1)^2 + (2n+1)^2 = 4m^2+4m+1 + 4n^2+4n+1 = 2(2m^2+2m+2n^2+2n+1) a 2 + b 2 = ( 2 m + 1 ) 2 + ( 2 n + 1 ) 2 = 4 m 2 + 4 m + 1 + 4 n 2 + 4 n + 1 = 2 ( 2 m 2 + 2 m + 2 n 2 + 2 n + 1 )
This is even but not divisible by 4. So c 2 c^2 c 2 is even but not divisible by 4, meaning c c c is even
(if c = 2 p c = 2p c = 2 p , c 2 = 4 p 2 c^2 = 4p^2 c 2 = 4 p 2 , which IS divisible by 4). Contradiction. ■ \blacksquare ■
If you get this wrong, revise: Proof by Contradiction — Section 2.
Details
Problem 11
Prove by induction that
∑ r = 1 n 1 r ( r + 1 ) = n n + 1 \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n}\frac{1}{r(r+1)} = \frac{n}{n+1} r = 1 ∑ n r ( r + 1 ) 1 = n + 1 n .
Details
Solution 11
Base case (n = 1 n=1 n = 1 ): ◆ L B ◆ 1 ◆ R B ◆◆ L B ◆ 1 × 2 ◆ R B ◆ = 1 2 = 1 1 + 1 \dfrac◆LB◆1◆RB◆◆LB◆1 \times 2◆RB◆ = \dfrac{1}{2} = \dfrac{1}{1+1} L ◆ B ◆1◆ R B ◆◆ L B ◆1 × 2◆ R B ◆ = 2 1 = 1 + 1 1 . ✓
Hypothesis: ∑ r = 1 k 1 r ( r + 1 ) = k k + 1 \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{k}\frac{1}{r(r+1)} = \frac{k}{k+1} r = 1 ∑ k r ( r + 1 ) 1 = k + 1 k .
Step:
∑ r = 1 k + 1 1 r ( r + 1 ) = k k + 1 + 1 ( k + 1 ) ( k + 2 ) = k ( k + 2 ) + 1 ( k + 1 ) ( k + 2 ) = k 2 + 2 k + 1 ( k + 1 ) ( k + 2 ) = ( k + 1 ) 2 ( k + 1 ) ( k + 2 ) = k + 1 k + 2 ■ \begin{aligned}
\sum_{r=1}^{k+1}\frac{1}{r(r+1)} &= \frac{k}{k+1} + \frac{1}{(k+1)(k+2)} \\
&= \frac{k(k+2)+1}{(k+1)(k+2)} \\
&= \frac{k^2+2k+1}{(k+1)(k+2)} \\
&= \frac{(k+1)^2}{(k+1)(k+2)} = \frac{k+1}{k+2} \quad \blacksquare
\end{aligned} r = 1 ∑ k + 1 r ( r + 1 ) 1 = k + 1 k + ( k + 1 ) ( k + 2 ) 1 = ( k + 1 ) ( k + 2 ) k ( k + 2 ) + 1 = ( k + 1 ) ( k + 2 ) k 2 + 2 k + 1 = ( k + 1 ) ( k + 2 ) ( k + 1 ) 2 = k + 2 k + 1 ■ If you get this wrong, revise:
Proof by Mathematical Induction — Section 5.
:::
:::
:::
Diagnostic Test
Ready to test your understanding of Proof ? The diagnostic test contains the hardest questions within the A-Level specification for this topic, each with a full worked solution.
Unit tests probe edge cases and common misconceptions. Integration tests combine Proof with other pure mathematics topics to test synthesis under exam conditions.
See Diagnostic Guide for instructions on self-marking and building a personal test matrix.