Skip to main content

Proof

Board Coverage

BoardPaperNotes
AQAPaper 1Proof by deduction, contradiction, exhaustion, counterexample
EdexcelP1, P2Similar; induction in P2
OCR (A)Paper 1, 2Proof is integrated throughout
CIE (9709)P1, P2, P3Various methods across papers
info

Proof questions appear on every paper. You must be able to identify the appropriate proof method and execute it clearly, with every step justified.


1. Proof by Deduction

1.1 Method

Proof by deduction starts from known axioms, definitions, or previously proved results, and uses logical steps to arrive at the desired conclusion.

1.2 Example: the sum of an arithmetic series

Theorem. Sn=n2(a+l)=n2[2a+(n1)d]S_n = \dfrac{n}{2}(a + l) = \dfrac{n}{2}[2a + (n-1)d].

Proof. Write out the sum forwards and backwards:

Sn=a+(a+d)+(a+2d)++(a+(n1)d)Sn=(a+(n1)d)+(a+(n2)d)++a\begin{aligned} S_n &= a + (a+d) + (a+2d) + \cdots + (a+(n-1)d) \\ S_n &= (a+(n-1)d) + (a+(n-2)d) + \cdots + a \end{aligned}

Adding the two rows term by term, each pair sums to 2a+(n1)d2a + (n-1)d, and there are nn such pairs:

2Sn=n[2a+(n1)d]    Sn=n2[2a+(n1)d]2S_n = n[2a + (n-1)d] \implies S_n = \frac{n}{2}[2a + (n-1)d] \quad \blacksquare

1.3 Example: the difference of squares

Theorem. a2b2=(ab)(a+b)a^2 - b^2 = (a-b)(a+b) for all a,bRa, b \in \mathbb{R}.

Proof. Expanding the right-hand side:

(ab)(a+b)=a2+ababb2=a2b2(a-b)(a+b) = a^2 + ab - ab - b^2 = a^2 - b^2 \quad \blacksquare


2. Proof by Contradiction

2.1 Method

To prove a statement PP by contradiction:

  1. Assume ¬P\neg P (the negation of PP).
  2. Derive a logical contradiction.
  3. Conclude that PP must be true.

2.2 Infinitely many primes

Theorem (Euclid). There are infinitely many prime numbers.

Proof. Suppose, for contradiction, that there are only finitely many primes: p1,p2,,pnp_1, p_2, \ldots, p_n.

Consider N=p1p2pn+1N = p_1 p_2 \cdots p_n + 1.

  • NN is not divisible by any pip_i: if piNp_i \mid N, then pi(Np1pn)=1p_i \mid (N - p_1 \cdots p_n) = 1, which is impossible since pi2p_i \geq 2.

So NN is either prime itself or divisible by a prime not in our list. Either way, there exists a prime not among p1,,pnp_1, \ldots, p_n. This contradicts our assumption that the list was complete. \blacksquare

2.3 2\sqrt{2} is irrational

Theorem. 2\sqrt{2} is irrational.

Proof. Suppose 2=ab\sqrt{2} = \dfrac{a}{b} where a,bZa, b \in \mathbb{Z}, b0b \neq 0, and gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b) = 1 (the fraction is in lowest terms).

2=a2b2    a2=2b22 = \frac{a^2}{b^2} \implies a^2 = 2b^2

So a2a^2 is even, which means aa is even (since the square of an odd number is odd). Write a=2ka = 2k.

(2k)2=2b2    4k2=2b2    b2=2k2(2k)^2 = 2b^2 \implies 4k^2 = 2b^2 \implies b^2 = 2k^2

So b2b^2 is even, meaning bb is even. But then gcd(a,b)2\gcd(a,b) \geq 2, contradicting gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b) = 1. \blacksquare

2.4 log23\log_2 3 is irrational

Theorem. log23\log_2 3 is irrational.

Proof. Suppose log23=ab\log_2 3 = \dfrac{a}{b} where a,bZ+a, b \in \mathbb{Z}^+ and gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b) = 1.

2a/b=3    2a=3b2^{a/b} = 3 \implies 2^a = 3^b

Since 2a2^a is even and 3b3^b is odd, this is a contradiction. \blacksquare


3. Proof by Exhaustion

3.1 Method

When the number of cases is finite and small enough, prove each case individually.

3.2 Example: primes less than 10

Claim. All primes less than 10 are odd.

Proof. The primes less than 10 are: 2, 3, 5, 7.

  • 2 is even (the only even prime).
  • 3, 5, 7 are odd.

So not all primes less than 10 are odd. The claim is false. The counterexample is 2.

3.3 Example: sum of two squares

Claim. For all integers nn with 1n51 \leq n \leq 5, n2+(n+1)2n^2 + (n+1)^2 is odd.

Proof. Check each case:

nnn2+(n+1)2n^2 + (n+1)^2Odd?
11 + 4 = 5Yes
24 + 9 = 13Yes
39 + 16 = 25Yes
416 + 25 = 41Yes
525 + 36 = 61Yes

All five cases confirmed. \blacksquare

warning

warning manageable. You cannot use exhaustion for "all integers" or "all real numbers."


4. Disproof by Counterexample

4.1 Method

To disprove a universal statement, it suffices to find one example where the statement fails.

4.2 Examples

Claim. "For all real xx, x2>xx^2 \gt{} x." Counterexample: x=0.5x = 0.5, since 0.250.50.25 \not> 0.5.

Claim. "All quadratics have two distinct real roots." Counterexample: x2+1=0x^2 + 1 = 0 has no real roots (discriminant =4<0= -4 \lt{} 0).

Claim. "If nn is prime, then 2n12^n - 1 is prime." Counterexample: n=11n = 11 is prime, but 2111=2047=23×892^{11}-1 = 2047 = 23 \times 89.


5. Proof by Mathematical Induction

5.1 Method

To prove a statement P(n)P(n) for all integers nn0n \geq n_0:

  1. Base case: Prove P(n0)P(n_0) is true.
  2. Inductive hypothesis: Assume P(k)P(k) is true for some kn0k \geq n_0.
  3. Inductive step: Using the hypothesis, prove P(k+1)P(k+1) is true.
  4. Conclusion: By the principle of mathematical induction, P(n)P(n) is true for all nn0n \geq n_0.
info

info non-empty set of positive integers has a least element. If P(n0)P(n_0) is true but some P(m)P(m) with m>n0m \gt{} n_0 is false, then the set {m:P(m)isfalse}\{m : P(m) \mathrm{ is false}\} has a least element, contradicting the inductive step.

5.2 Sum of the first nn integers

Theorem. r=1nr=n(n+1)2\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} r = \frac{n(n+1)}{2} for all nNn \in \mathbb{N}.

Proof.

Base case (n=1n=1): r=11r=1=LB1×2RB◆◆LB2RB\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{1} r = 1 = \frac◆LB◆1 \times 2◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆. ✓

Inductive hypothesis: Assume r=1kr=k(k+1)2\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{k} r = \frac{k(k+1)}{2} for some k1k \geq 1.

Inductive step:

r=1k+1r=r=1kr+(k+1)=k(k+1)2+(k+1)(byhypothesis)=k(k+1)+2(k+1)2=(k+1)(k+2)2\begin{aligned} \sum_{r=1}^{k+1} r &= \sum_{r=1}^{k} r + (k+1) \\ &= \frac{k(k+1)}{2} + (k+1) \quad \mathrm{(by hypothesis)} \\ &= \frac{k(k+1) + 2(k+1)}{2} \\ &= \frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2} \end{aligned}

This is the required formula with n=k+1n = k+1. ✓

Conclusion: By induction, the formula holds for all nNn \in \mathbb{N}. \blacksquare

5.3 Sum of squares

Theorem. r=1nr2=n(n+1)(2n+1)6\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} r^2 = \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}.

Proof.

Base case (n=1n=1): 1=LB1×2×3RB◆◆LB6RB=11 = \dfrac◆LB◆1 \times 2 \times 3◆RB◆◆LB◆6◆RB◆ = 1. ✓

Inductive hypothesis: Assume r=1kr2=k(k+1)(2k+1)6\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{k} r^2 = \frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6}.

Inductive step:

r=1k+1r2=k(k+1)(2k+1)6+(k+1)2=k(k+1)(2k+1)+6(k+1)26=(k+1)[k(2k+1)+6(k+1)]6=(k+1)[2k2+k+6k+6]6=(k+1)(2k2+7k+6)6=(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)6\begin{aligned} \sum_{r=1}^{k+1} r^2 &= \frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6} + (k+1)^2 \\ &= \frac{k(k+1)(2k+1) + 6(k+1)^2}{6} \\ &= \frac{(k+1)[k(2k+1) + 6(k+1)]}{6} \\ &= \frac{(k+1)[2k^2+k+6k+6]}{6} \\ &= \frac{(k+1)(2k^2+7k+6)}{6} \\ &= \frac{(k+1)(k+2)(2k+3)}{6} \end{aligned}

This is the formula with n=k+1n = k+1. ✓ \blacksquare

5.4 Divisibility

Theorem. 3n13^n - 1 is divisible by 2 for all nNn \in \mathbb{N}.

Proof.

Base case (n=1n=1): 311=23^1 - 1 = 2, which is divisible by 2. ✓

Hypothesis: Assume 3k1=2m3^k - 1 = 2m for some integer mm.

Step: 3k+11=33k1=3(2m+1)1=6m+31=6m+2=2(3m+1)3^{k+1} - 1 = 3 \cdot 3^k - 1 = 3(2m+1) - 1 = 6m + 3 - 1 = 6m + 2 = 2(3m+1).

This is divisible by 2. ✓ \blacksquare

Theorem. 4n14^n - 1 is divisible by 3 for all nNn \in \mathbb{N}.

Proof.

Base case (n=1n=1): 41=34-1 = 3, divisible by 3. ✓

Hypothesis: 4k1=3m4^k - 1 = 3m.

Step: 4k+11=44k1=4(3m+1)1=12m+41=12m+3=3(4m+1)4^{k+1} - 1 = 4 \cdot 4^k - 1 = 4(3m+1)-1 = 12m+4-1 = 12m+3 = 3(4m+1). ✓ \blacksquare

5.5 Inequalities

Theorem. 2n>n2^n \gt{} n for all nNn \in \mathbb{N}.

Proof.

Base case (n=1n=1): 2>12 \gt{} 1. ✓

Hypothesis: 2k>k2^k \gt{} k.

Step: 2k+1=22k>2kk+12^{k+1} = 2 \cdot 2^k \gt{} 2k \geq k + 1 (since k1k \geq 1 implies k1k \geq 1).

So 2k+1>k+12^{k+1} \gt{} k + 1. ✓ \blacksquare

Theorem. n!>2nn! \gt{} 2^n for all n4n \geq 4.

Proof.

Base case (n=4n=4): 24>1624 \gt{} 16. ✓

Hypothesis: k!>2kk! \gt{} 2^k for k4k \geq 4.

Step: (k+1)!=(k+1)k!>(k+1)2k52k>22k=2k+1(k+1)! = (k+1) \cdot k! \gt{} (k+1) \cdot 2^k \geq 5 \cdot 2^k \gt{} 2 \cdot 2^k = 2^{k+1}.

Since k4k \geq 4, we have k+15>2k+1 \geq 5 \gt{} 2. ✓ \blacksquare


6. Proof Structures and Logic

6.1 Necessary and sufficient conditions

  • "PP is necessary for QQ" means Q    PQ \implies P.
  • "PP is sufficient for QQ" means P    QP \implies Q.
  • "PP if and only if QQ" (written P    QP \iff Q) means both P    QP \implies Q and Q    PQ \implies P.

6.2 Converse and contrapositive

  • The converse of P    QP \implies Q is Q    PQ \implies P (not logically equivalent).
  • The contrapositive of P    QP \implies Q is ¬Q    ¬P\neg Q \implies \neg P (logically equivalent).

Problem Set

Details

Problem 1 Prove that the product of two odd numbers is odd.

Details

Solution 1 Let the two odd numbers be 2m+12m+1 and 2n+12n+1 where m,nZm, n \in \mathbb{Z}.

(2m+1)(2n+1)=4mn+2m+2n+1=2(2mn+m+n)+1(2m+1)(2n+1) = 4mn + 2m + 2n + 1 = 2(2mn+m+n) + 1.

This is of the form 2k+12k+1 (with k=2mn+m+nk = 2mn+m+n), hence odd. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Proof by Deduction — Section 1.

Details

Problem 2 Prove by contradiction that there is no greatest even integer.

Details

Solution 2 Suppose NN is the greatest even integer. Then N=2kN = 2k for some kZk \in \mathbb{Z}.

But N+2=2k+2=2(k+1)N + 2 = 2k + 2 = 2(k+1) is also even, and N+2>NN+2 \gt{} N. This contradicts NN being the greatest even integer. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Proof by Contradiction — Section 2.

Details

Problem 3 Prove by induction that r=1nr3=[n(n+1)2]2\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n} r^3 = \left[\frac{n(n+1)}{2}\right]^2 for all nNn \in \mathbb{N}.

Details

Solution 3 Base case (n=1n=1): 13=1=[LB12RB◆◆LB2RB]2=11^3 = 1 = \left[\dfrac◆LB◆1 \cdot 2◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆\right]^2 = 1. ✓

Hypothesis: r=1kr3=[k(k+1)2]2\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{k} r^3 = \left[\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right]^2.

Step:

r=1k+1r3=[k(k+1)2]2+(k+1)3=k2(k+1)24+(k+1)3=(k+1)2[k2+4(k+1)]4=(k+1)2(k2+4k+4)4=(k+1)2(k+2)24=[(k+1)(k+2)2]2\begin{aligned} \sum_{r=1}^{k+1} r^3 &= \left[\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right]^2 + (k+1)^3 \\ &= \frac{k^2(k+1)^2}{4} + (k+1)^3 \\ &= \frac{(k+1)^2[k^2 + 4(k+1)]}{4} \\ &= \frac{(k+1)^2(k^2+4k+4)}{4} \\ &= \frac{(k+1)^2(k+2)^2}{4} \\ &= \left[\frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{2}\right]^2 \quad \blacksquare \end{aligned}

If you get this wrong, revise: Proof by Mathematical Induction — Section 5.

Details

Problem 4 Prove that 3\sqrt{3} is irrational.

Details

Solution 4 Suppose 3=a/b\sqrt{3} = a/b in lowest terms with a,bZ+a, b \in \mathbb{Z}^+, gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b) = 1.

3=a2/b2    a2=3b23 = a^2/b^2 \implies a^2 = 3b^2, so 3a23 \mid a^2, hence 3a3 \mid a. Write a=3ka = 3k.

9k2=3b2    b2=3k29k^2 = 3b^2 \implies b^2 = 3k^2, so 3b23 \mid b^2, hence 3b3 \mid b.

But gcd(a,b)3\gcd(a,b) \geq 3, contradicting gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b) = 1. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: 2\sqrt{2} is irrational — Section 2.3.

Details

Problem 5 Disprove by counterexample: "For all real xx, sin(2x)=2sinx\sin(2x) = 2\sin x."

Details

Solution 5 Let x=π/4x = \pi/4. sin(π/2)=1\sin(\pi/2) = 1 but 2sin(π/4)=2×LB2RB◆◆LB2RB=212\sin(\pi/4) = 2 \times \dfrac◆LB◆\sqrt{2}◆RB◆◆LB◆2◆RB◆ = \sqrt{2} \neq 1.

(The correct identity is sin(2x)=2sinxcosx\sin(2x) = 2\sin x\cos x.)

If you get this wrong, revise: Disproof by Counterexample — Section 4.

Details

Problem 6 Prove by induction that 5n+35^n + 3 is divisible by 4 for all n1n \geq 1.

Details

Solution 6 Base case (n=1n=1): 5+3=85 + 3 = 8, divisible by 4. ✓

Hypothesis: 5k+3=4m5^k + 3 = 4m.

Step: 5k+1+3=55k+3=5(4m3)+3=20m15+3=20m12=4(5m3)5^{k+1} + 3 = 5 \cdot 5^k + 3 = 5(4m-3) + 3 = 20m - 15 + 3 = 20m - 12 = 4(5m-3).

Divisible by 4. ✓ \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Divisibility — Section 5.4.

Details

Problem 7 Prove by contradiction that log35\log_3 5 is irrational.

Details

Solution 7 Suppose log35=a/b\log_3 5 = a/b where a,bZ+a, b \in \mathbb{Z}^+, gcd(a,b)=1\gcd(a,b)=1.

3a/b=5    3a=5b3^{a/b} = 5 \implies 3^a = 5^b.

3a3^a is odd and 5b5^b is odd, so no immediate parity contradiction. But: 3a3^a is divisible only by 3, while 5b5^b is divisible only by 5. A positive integer cannot have prime factorisation using only 3s and also only 5s (by the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, prime factorisation is unique). Contradiction. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: log23\log_2 3 is irrational — Section 2.4.

Details

Problem 8 Use proof by exhaustion to show that all integers nn with 1n61 \leq n \leq 6 satisfy: if nn is prime, then n21n^2 - 1 is divisible by 24 or n=2n = 2 or n=3n = 3.

Details

Solution 8 Primes in range: 2, 3, 5.

n=2n=2: n21=3n^2-1 = 3, not divisible by 24 (special case n=2n=2). n=3n=3: n21=8n^2-1 = 8, not divisible by 24 (special case n=3n=3). n=5n=5: n21=24n^2-1 = 24, divisible by 24. ✓

So the claim holds: primes 2 and 3 are exceptions, and 521=245^2 - 1 = 24 is divisible by 24.

If you get this wrong, revise: Proof by Exhaustion — Section 3.

Details

Problem 9 Prove by induction that n3nn^3 - n is divisible by 6 for all n1n \geq 1.

Details

Solution 9 Base case (n=1n=1): 11=01-1=0, divisible by 6. ✓

Hypothesis: k3k=6mk^3 - k = 6m.

Step: (k+1)3(k+1)=k3+3k2+3k+1k1=(k3k)+3k2+3k=6m+3k(k+1)(k+1)^3 - (k+1) = k^3 + 3k^2 + 3k + 1 - k - 1 = (k^3 - k) + 3k^2 + 3k = 6m + 3k(k+1).

Since k(k+1)k(k+1) is always even (product of consecutive integers), 3k(k+1)3k(k+1) is divisible by 6. So (k+1)3(k+1)=6m+6n=6(m+n)(k+1)^3 - (k+1) = 6m + 6n = 6(m+n). ✓ \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Divisibility — Section 5.4.

Details

Problem 10 Prove that if a2+b2=c2a^2 + b^2 = c^2 for integers a,b,ca, b, c, then at least one of a,ba, b is even.

Details

Solution 10 Proof by contradiction. Suppose both aa and bb are odd. Write a=2m+1a = 2m+1, b=2n+1b = 2n+1.

a2+b2=(2m+1)2+(2n+1)2=4m2+4m+1+4n2+4n+1=2(2m2+2m+2n2+2n+1)a^2 + b^2 = (2m+1)^2 + (2n+1)^2 = 4m^2+4m+1 + 4n^2+4n+1 = 2(2m^2+2m+2n^2+2n+1)

This is even but not divisible by 4. So c2c^2 is even but not divisible by 4, meaning cc is even (if c=2pc = 2p, c2=4p2c^2 = 4p^2, which IS divisible by 4). Contradiction. \blacksquare

If you get this wrong, revise: Proof by Contradiction — Section 2.

Details

Problem 11 Prove by induction that r=1n1r(r+1)=nn+1\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{n}\frac{1}{r(r+1)} = \frac{n}{n+1}.

Details

Solution 11 Base case (n=1n=1): LB1RB◆◆LB1×2RB=12=11+1\dfrac◆LB◆1◆RB◆◆LB◆1 \times 2◆RB◆ = \dfrac{1}{2} = \dfrac{1}{1+1}. ✓

Hypothesis: r=1k1r(r+1)=kk+1\displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^{k}\frac{1}{r(r+1)} = \frac{k}{k+1}.

Step:

r=1k+11r(r+1)=kk+1+1(k+1)(k+2)=k(k+2)+1(k+1)(k+2)=k2+2k+1(k+1)(k+2)=(k+1)2(k+1)(k+2)=k+1k+2\begin{aligned} \sum_{r=1}^{k+1}\frac{1}{r(r+1)} &= \frac{k}{k+1} + \frac{1}{(k+1)(k+2)} \\ &= \frac{k(k+2)+1}{(k+1)(k+2)} \\ &= \frac{k^2+2k+1}{(k+1)(k+2)} \\ &= \frac{(k+1)^2}{(k+1)(k+2)} = \frac{k+1}{k+2} \quad \blacksquare \end{aligned}

If you get this wrong, revise: Proof by Mathematical Induction — Section 5.

:::

:::

:::


tip

Diagnostic Test Ready to test your understanding of Proof? The diagnostic test contains the hardest questions within the A-Level specification for this topic, each with a full worked solution.

Unit tests probe edge cases and common misconceptions. Integration tests combine Proof with other pure mathematics topics to test synthesis under exam conditions.

See Diagnostic Guide for instructions on self-marking and building a personal test matrix.